How to liberate Hastings’ people from the worst deprivation in the country

The biggest story of the week, and probably this month, on Hastings In Focus is the news that Hastings fairs particularly badly in ‘The Indices of Deprivation’ that have just been published. They show that in seven of the 11 identified areas, problems in Hastings have got worse. Here Liberal democrat Nick Perry, who will be bidding to be the local MP when a General Election is called, argues that our borough council needs to accept it’s share of the blame.

 

72055669_955671168131492_2107948027363721216_n
Nick Perry.

The newly released 2019 Index of Multiple Deprivation shows Hastings Borough becoming more deprived in seven out of the 11 identified domains, which has got to be a major cause for concern for all of us who care about it writes Nick Perry.

Without doubt, the Conservative Government funding deal for councils since 2015 has been unfair and has taken its toll, even though, by then, the budget deficit had been halved after the financial crash of 2008-10, allowing a loosening of the reins.

Having said this, as I witnessed on Facebook last week, any suggestion that Hastings’ Labour Council should be held accountable for its performance in respect of our poorest neighbourhoods generates howls of rage from hard-line local Labour diehards, unable to deal with the fact that their party is in power here.

Let’s be clear. However tough the national funding settlement is, all councils have choices on what they organise, how they prioritise and who gets what slice of the meagre pie they have been given. And to be honest ‘how to do regeneration’ is not a new discussion here in Hastings. It has been going on for decades.

The Labour Council is the establishment, having been in office with big majorities since 2010 and it looks like it has been as seduced by a ‘flashy building projects’ approach to regeneration as was the Tory administration immediately before it.

The Labour leader of the Council has sat on the Board of Sea Space or Sea Change, or whatever it is called now, the totally opaque, unaccountable quango that has managed to spend millions and millions of pounds on unused commercial square footage in the town centre and the failed Enviro 21 industrial park off Queensway.

The very same organisation that successfully arranged for the Queensway Gateway Road to be built at the expense of the Hollington Valley and its bio-diversity. To what regeneration end?

Screenshot 2019-10-17 08.16.05
The road to nowhere – Queensway gateway.

Hundreds of millions of regeneration pounds have been spent here over the past 20 years – mainly in town, not so much the rural parts of the constituency – yet what do we have to show for them apart from some big, newish buildings and a railway station with a facelift that is already looking tired?

Sadly, as the new figures show, whatever we are doing is just not working for our poorest neighbourhoods.

So, what should happen instead?

As someone who started his working life in community development projects, it seems obvious to me that we need to do much more than invest in ‘flash building projects’. It is more effective to focus efforts on re-working budgets and co-ordinating services around our most deprived neighbourhoods.

So, for example, Hastings’ council could have decided to use its considerable land and property portfolio to set up a network of one-stop hubs powered by solar energy in our local neighbourhoods. These buildings could be used to provide a range of easy-to-access community and outreach services that encourage and engage residents, rather than cost extra bus or taxi fares.

enviro21-from-design-access-statement
An artist’s impression of the Enviro 21 project.

Hastings Borough’s deprivation indices are built on inter-generational disadvantage going back 50 years. This is the pattern that must shift if the results are to change for the better.

Low local skill levels can put off businesses moving in: there needs be a revolution in education and skills, not just for children and young adults but for their mums and dads too. Excellent primary and secondary schooling with extra tutoring where needed are key to opening up life chances, but we have to go way beyond this.

When Brighton University decided to pull out, after millions of pounds of investment, why was there no real effort to get another university to open a satellite here? Or, using our reputation as a creative town, why did the council not try to get a leading arts school to take over the campus? Instead, they raised the white flag and shamefully allowed us to become Britain’s shortest-lived university town.

‘Hand-ups’ rather than hand-outs must be the spirit of what we do. And that help must be accompanied by well-designed council housing, decent neighbourhood-based facilities and by apprenticeships and jobs. Art and sport matter too as they do so much to build confidence and self-esteem. Why, for example, were the opportunities to work with Hastings United not taken forward when they were presented?

And why can’t we just get the Hastings Greenway done, with all the public health, community access and sustainable transport benefits it would bring?

stacks_image_2803
Hastings Greenway is an ambitious and ‘environmentally friendly’ proposal.

Hastings Borough Council needs to seriously up its game and be the radical and strategic lead organisation joining up the services that disadvantaged neighbourhoods need, in nicely designed, green, fit for purpose buildings. This is where the regeneration millions should have been going; not to carpet long-empty office blocks like Priory Quarter.

I have written elsewhere recently that Hastings Pier winning the Stirling Prize for architecture back in 2017 appears to have been a missed opportunity in respect of kick-starting a borough-wide commitment to good design, especially since we have an incredible architectural heritage here in Hastings and St Leonards. We only need look at this year’s Stirling winner – new council housing commissioned in Labour-held Norwich – to see what is possible.

Instead, what do we see here? An Ore Valley Community Land Trust team evicted from long-unused land in order that one of the nation’s big estate agents could market the site for mainstream commercial gain.

This is a bizarre case of pulling the lifeline on a community-led project in a poorly served area offered a chance to make its own future on a site that had been empty for decades. Now the likely outcome is another bog-standard housing estate by a mainstream developer.

Let’s hope the affordable housing requirement is enforced this time.

The council’s overriding aim must be to try to provide excellence in our deprived neighbourhoods, not just moan about central government, and accept sub-standard materials due to sub-standard revenue grants.

Everything the council does should be about investing in the town, seeking every means available to liberate people from some of the worst deprivation in the country.

We must shout this from our East and West Hilltops. We must get ourselves on (faster) trains to lobby Government ministers. We must get them back down to our borough, helping to create a programme of change that will turn things around.

Being defensive serves no purpose other than to condemn our most disadvantaged neighbours to more of the same. The challenge for all of us local politicians is to shift the numbers in the right direction and help people reach their potential. The town is getting great press and making strides after decades of being written off but let’s make sure we can all share the spoils in a way that, frankly, isn’t currently the case.

Nothing less than that is good enough, and the new MP for Hastings and Rye should make this work the priority.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “How to liberate Hastings’ people from the worst deprivation in the country

Add yours

  1. Some words of wisdom from Nick Perry here. This article should be published and posted around the town so people can see precisely what this council has been up to. . It is shocking in the extreme to read some of the content.
    This labour council has, year in and year out blamed the government for all the failings in this tow .never once admitting that it could possibly be their poor housekeeping which is at fault here.
    .Borrowing millions in order to invest in very dodgy investments..approving new roads to the detriment of some of our historical green spaces..roads which are leading to nowhere, investments which are doomed to failure..the list is endless and .when the proverbial hits the fan perhaps then this council will acknowledge the folly of their ways.
    We need a new broom to sweep the debris far far away…and sooner rather than later.

    Like

  2. While I do not agree with Nick’s politics, that being the Liberal’s, I do have to say how he has defined the issues in the Borough perfectly well. And I will also say he tried his best in his day as lone Liberal councillor.
    Among the issues he has raised which I believe is of concern is the “unaccountable” Sea Change / Sea Space. As the real names behind these two catchy names are limited companies that are “opaque” to the public where a Freedom of Information (FOI) request is prohibited. Therefore you never really know what has or is going on unless you do some astute research. Also while they have serving councillors as directors they too never divulge anything unless of course they make some announcement of a new commercial development, a new road. Always followed with a speech on how it is going to do great things for the Borough etc. Kind of like that line, “Build it and they will come.” Something that has not been quite materialised.
    As Nick says these two companies behind those two names have had millions given to them via various grants from SEEDA and central government. Yet hidden away behind these two were another two registered companies set up by the same people ( more or less ) that within three years went into Liquidation for over £2m each after having their loans called in by Allied Irish Bank. Now we have this Queensway Gateway road that has come to a halt – why – no money to complete it. Is that why Nick Sea Change / Space has suddenly put that Ore land up for sale??? Need to generate some revenue. Another thing here that puzzles me is how HBC have handed land over to these two companies. Then they go back to the council with a planning application and get it passed of course – no questions asked.
    Regarding the rage Nick says he gets from the Labour contingency. Look back over their term in control of this Borough and someone tell me when they have ever put their hand up and say we did this or that wrong.

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: